Some
people –maybe with their best intentions--
confuse to be open minded with the acceptance “bona fide” of any issue that directly,
indirectly or supposedly has something –and sometimes nothing—to do with the
UAP subject..
Under
the idea of being neutral, the rationality, the common sense, the good judgment,
the logic, the demand for evidence or proof, all of that is put on hold or set
aside. And then everything is welcome: crop circles, ancient astronauts, men in
black, underground cities, teleportation, automatic writing, telepathic
messages from aliens, contactees, trips on flying saucers, etc.
This
stance is not only un-scientific, it is really absurd.
As
human beings we are equipped with intelligence to discern what is right and
what is wrong, what is fact and what is fiction, what makes sense and what is
nonsensical, what is reliable and what is suspicious at least if not really
faked, what is certain and what is speculation, what is dealing with reality or
with a far/fetched story.
An
dealing directly with the UAP subject we need to wonder what could be the
truth behind a story and what amount of disinformation is spread by intelligence
sources to make us believe in things that really do not exist or that if they exist
they are of a different nature that the one they want us to believe.
The
UAP subject has been the object of a vast psychological operation from various
sources. Unless we are aware of this fact, we do not know really what we are
dealing with.
On
the other hand, the negligible percentage of the unknown is the only thing that
still should demand our attention, investigation and study.
And
the best approach to develop such an investigation, study and come to
acceptable conclusions, is to pursue the latest trend on this matter: be well
equipped with various instruments, choose the place where the Unusual Aerial
Phenomenon is repeatedly reported and try with all that means, (photograph,
video, radar, spectrometer,
magnetometer, microphones) all coordinated and chronologically developed
through a software program, to gather all the possible data and afterward get
them analyzed by a multidisciplinary group of scientists.
Fantasy,
conspiracy theories, believers, swindlers, the commercial exploitation,
pseudo-science approaches, etc. have no room whatsoever to be mixed with the
UAP subject properly considered
This
is the lesson that I’ve learned during 55 five years dedicated to the investigation
and study of the UAP (50 of which in C.I.O.V.I.): neutrality is not
objectivity.
This
task –as many others— requires seriousness, discipline, and engagement.
Milton W. Hourcade
No comments:
Post a Comment