The final purpose of that memo is the recommendation for
the creation of “detailed study” of the “flying discs” (as they were then
called).
After reviewing the main characteristics of the “flying
discs”, Gen. Twining writes:
“Due consideration must be given the following:-
(1)The possibility
that these objects are of domestic origin - the product of some high
security project not known to AC/AS-2 or this Command.
(2) The lack of
physical evidence in the shape of crash recovered exhibits which would
undeniably prove the existence of these objects.
(3) The possibility that some foreign nation has a
form of propulsion possibly nuclear, which is outside of our domestic
knowledge.
My comments:
A - A domestic
origin is not discarded.
B - Had de
incident near Roswell being something strange, the second paragraph would be nonsense.
C -The
speculation about the origin of the “flying discs” is referred to nations. In
1947 there was not room for “extraterrestrials”.
2 - The second one is the press conference given by Major
General John A. Samford, USAF Director of Intelligence.
Have in mind that
this press conference took place on July 29, 1952, after lights were seen over
the capital of the U.S. in two opportunities during that month.
Also, it is
necessary to understand that Major General Samford is talking to the press in
the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Department of Defense, and is speaking as
a military authority, not giving his personal viewpoints.
Being this the
frame for his declarations, two things call the attention. First, when he said:
“We know that reports of this kind go
back to Biblical times.”
And a little bit
later, once again he mention those times: “There's
more man-made activity in the air now than there was, certainly, in Biblical
times or in 1846.”
It is outstanding that he speaks about “man-made activity
in the air”, not about alien activity.
I the context of an official act, I found very remarkable
the mention twice to “Biblical times”. Particularly when near the end of the
press conference, Samford said this nearly enigmatic phrase:
“I think that the highest probability is that
these are phenomena associated with the intellectual and scientific interests
that we are on the road to learn more about but that there is nothing in
them that is associated with material or vehicles or missiles that are directed
against the United States.”
Four statements are made here, all of them extremely
important because I think they are intrinsically related with the UFOs origin.
-Highest probability
-Phenomena associated with intellectual and scientific
interests.
-They are on the road to learn more about, which implies
that they already know something.
-Not directed against the United States
The only possible conclusion to infer from these words is
that Major General Samford and some other people in the USAF already have a
very good idea about who was the intelligence (the intellectual and scientific
interests) behind the flying discs.
And because of that, and only because of that, he –as a
military authority—could proclaim in front of a great number of journalists
that “there is nothing in them that is
associated with material or vehicles or missiles that are directed against the
United States.”
I can assure that nobody in the United States, and much
less a military authority would dare to publicly make that affirmation if it
were not true.
The affirmation that UFOs "do not constitute a menace to the
national security of the United States” has thereafter being repeated many
times by different authorities and agencies.
This last statement made by Major General Samford obliges
to pose the question about who could have at that time those “intellectual and
scientific interests”. Were they by chance associated with “reports going back to the Biblical times”.
Conclusion: In the span of 5 years,
apparently certain circles in the USA were enough acquainted about who could be
behind the “flying discs”, and if there was a pact –as it could be presumed there was— the responsible for the “flying discs”
received some guarantees and protections, in exchange for technological
transference and the freedom to continue with some experiments.
Some of those experiments could have implied the use of
animals and human beings too and –of course—
provided such thing happened, it must have been related with intelligence
and the military.
Civilians were mostly out of the equation.
If this is possible and has an intrinsic logic, then we
can think not about a parallel universe (in terms of Physics) but of a parallel
reality, in physical terms.
The idea that the “flying discs” could be or –as some
people still believe— extraterrestrial origin, was elaborated by
some military personnel of intelligence within the USAF, was astutely used by
the US Navy, and served as a cover-up for experimental aircrafts and aerial
activities, as well as for operational projects.
But that idea finds its support in the totally different
shape and dynamic characteristics of the “flying discs” which indeed have been
very revolutionary, and couldn’t be recognized as something following the technological
patterns already used and known in the Western world and other parts of the
planet.
Every time a pilot, or even a scientist, said something
like: “the object performed incredible maneuvers impossible for an airplane to
do, and developed suddenly tremendous speed” they have found as the easiest and
most possible explanation what is summarized in this phrase: “that is not of
this world”.
But yes, it is or it could certainly be of this world,
but not following the basic tenets of the Physics developed in the Western
nations, (US, UK, France, etc), but different ones. And that special
circumstance was what allowed a small group of people to develop new forms of
energy applied to flying artifacts, probably remotely controlled.
That group of people was far ahead all the other
scientists and technicians, and maybe they found inspiration and even more, in
their “scientific and intellectual interests”, looking for some artifacts from
the Biblical times.
I leave to the reader to think about what group of people
could have been originally behind the “flying discs”.
In the meantime let me say that at the very beginning of
the “flying discs” issue, military authorities and the people in general,
thought about three possible origins, all of them terrestrial of course.
The E.T. idea began and it is deliberately promoted
starting in 1950.
Milton W. Hourcade
No comments:
Post a Comment