Time runs very quickly. Half of 2018 is already gone.
That is why I’ve found interesting and even intriguing to return to some books
I’ve read a long time ago, to see what they thought and said then, and how it
sounds today.
How much of those thoughts remain valid, and how many of
them have to be thrown out to the wastebasket.
So I choose to start with this book of Keith Thompson
attracted by the title of it.
Undoubtedly, I expected a different approach to the UAP
subject, and there is one, although the author carefully walks on a middle line
avoiding risking a definite opinion.
On page 46 he mentions the renowned Psychologist Carl
Gustav Jung, that every one of us remembers for his famous book "Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of
Things Seen in the Skies" (1979).
Thompson says that "Jung came to believe that
archetypes are not purely psychic but rather possess an inherent impulse to
transgress their psychic frames and materialize in visible forms.” “The archetypes of the collective unconscious
tend toward manifestation.”
He adds that the new generation of
investigators “looked to parapsychology, religious studies, folklore and
mythology for new kinds of insights into a phenomenon whose effects called into
question where mind leaves off and matter begins.”
This represents for me a very dangerous cocktail that
goes far beyond apart from rationality and logic.
I think Thompson is notoriously influenced by Jacques
Vallée, whose way of thinking goes quite near to his ideas, and therefore he
says: “Perhaps something quite ancient from the world soul was making its
periodic return, in a novel form, as part of a larger cycle or spiral of
manifestation.” (page 65).
Later he dedicates to try to explain the Betty and Barney
Hill case, taken as an example where mythical influences and facts mix
together. Therefore, he mentions Donald Keyhoe’s The Flying Saucer Conspiracy book from which Betty took some ideas,
also the film Invaders from Mars, and
the episode “The Bellero Shield” of
the series “The Outer Limits”, as
sources that contributed to their “abduction case”. (pages 66 and 67).
On page 194, Thompson transcribes Jacques Vallée when the
French scientific says: “I have been led to conclude that there is a spiritual
control system for human consciousness and that paranormal phenomena like UFOs
are one of its manifestations. It is possible that this control is natural and
spontaneous. It might be explainable in terms of genetics, or by the principles
of social psychology, or as an unknown aspect of ordinary phenomena. It is
possibly artificial in nature, under the power of some superhuman will. Perhaps
the answer consists of a combination of these –no one can say for certain.”
What to expect for the future?
Have in mind that this book was written in 1993.
It is more than interesting to see what some
investigators and people in some way related with the UFO subject said about
the future of it.
Thompson describes the situation then as this: “Meanwhile,
compelling sighting reports continue to be made, often by highly credible
witnesses. As experts –governmental,
military, academic and scientific—consistently refuse to consider the growing
body of first-person accounts, witnesses and the public at large reach their
own conclusions about the true nature of UFO events.”
It results curiously for me to verify the ideas and
reactions of some well known ufologists at that time.
Apparently the amount of sightings has been going down,
and Thompson writes: “Today, with fewer of what ufologists call ‘high-quality
sightings’ than in many years, longtime investigator (and ET-hypothesis
champion) Jerome Clark predicts an imminent solution to the entire controversy.(page
241).
“Our long quest is almost over,” Clark states. “We soon,
I think, will know what UFOs are.”
And then Thompson cites two abductologists, Budd Hopkins
and David M. Jacobs.
Hopkins said: “After decades of painstaking and
persistent investigation, including many false leads and dead ends, the UFO
phenomenon is at last revealing its core secrets.”
Jacobs meanwhile said:”We may be on the threshold of
momentous discoveries”.
Frankly, I am surprised by the enthusiastic and confident
attitude of these people.
And Thompson comments:
“Maybe
the end is indeed near.
Yes.
This
time. At last.
Then
again, maybe not.” (page 241)
On page 245, the author says: “no UFO sightings currently
stir major controversy, so unlike the 1960s and 1970s when the UFO fieldworkers
eagerly awaited their next on-site assignment, their pronouncements conveyed to
the nation on network television.”
“These and other signs are interpreted to mean the UFO
phenomenon will simply fade away as strangely as its sudden arrival, that it
will take its place in folklore with vampires, leprechauns, and werewolves as a
folkloric motif specific to a particular historical epoch.” (page 245) [the
underline is mine].
We can consider this as a prophetic view.
It is clear that Keith Thompson finally, does not
pronounce himself on the identity of the UFOs, nor does he raises the problem
of public ignorance and the lack of an appropriate investigation of the
reported cases.
Fewer addresses the question of how military intelligence used the UFO
issue to benefit its own interests and plans.
And he does not mention anything fundamental: to frame the UFOs as a matter of psychological warfare, as a great psychological operation or operations.
And he does not mention anything fundamental: to frame the UFOs as a matter of psychological warfare, as a great psychological operation or operations.
Milton W. Hourcade
June 2018, Iowa City.
No comments:
Post a Comment